In recent times, global media has consistently showcased dramatic images depicting extensive forest fires. Implicitly, these phenomena are attributed to the mythical "climate change," now referred to as "global warming." However, is this the actual reality? Nearly all significant vegetation fires in recent months have turned out to be the result of intentional arson rather than natural heat.

The sensationalizing of forest fires, presented as a visible sign of the promoted "climate catastrophe" by climate activists, began with the annual bushfires in Australia in 2020. We heard about hundreds of millions of animals perishing, witnessed heart-wrenching images of charred koala bears, and were informed by the media that these fires were evidence of a terrifying climate change. But is this truly the case?

Even then, three years ago, it was revealed that someone intentionally set fire to the Australian bush. Ultimately, dozens of arsonists spreading intentional fires were apprehended. Is it a coincidence that climate activists attach themselves to these incidents, suggesting that these are not arson but the consequences of human activities due to the accumulation of anthropogenic greenhouse gases?

Subsequently, similar forest fires were sensationalized in Portugal and Spain. The same voices arose, claiming it was a result of climate change, and humanity must be taxed, or we will burn. Once again, it turned out that mysterious arsonists were to blame, their actions sensationalized by the media to spread fear and persuade people to make sacrifices due to climate change.

This year, spectacular forest fires occurred in Canada, leading to smoke that turned the sky orange in the United States, including New York. Climate alarmists seized the opportunity, declaring it as evidence of anthropogenic climate change. What was the reality? Just like in previous cases, these fires were indeed anthropogenic, as someone intentionally set the forests ablaze. Is it possible that climate activists were behind these actions, handing a story to the media to drum the drums of doom or who else is to blame for those firey incidents?
If those worldwide phenomenons were really manmade, one has to ask the question, what is the purpose to achieve by igniting most forested and burnable areas on Earth?

During the ongoing summer vacations, the same strategy has been employed. Initially, there were reports of massive fires on the Greek island of Rhodes. Terrified tourists were shown being evacuated from hotels, and an apocalyptic sky was depicted. An impression was created that Greece was experiencing some end-of-the-world scenario due to climate change. What was the reality? As usual, these were intentional arsons. The motive remains unclear, as besides the climate alarmists' agenda, there is also a business motive. Burning vegetation clears the land for future hotel construction. Locals even suggested during the fires that these were intentional actions, but this knowledge did not penetrate the media.

Recently, similar forest fires occurred on one of the Canary Islands - Tenerife. Faced with the evacuation of thousands of people and immense ecological losses, the question arose again: Why did this happen? Were these deliberate arsons, or is it genuinely a tragic symptom of climate change? Island authorities have already confirmed that the fires on Tenerife were also the result of intentional arson. Equally alarming were the recent fires in Hawaii. Is there a dark motive here, or is it an expression of an increasingly unstable environment?

The theory of arson as a tool to scare people and manipulate opinions about the climate crisis is as controversial as it is disturbing. Indeed, the media presents fires in a way that often emphasizes climate change as the main cause, marginalizing other possibilities. Red and black colors on weather maps and dramatic photos of burning forests may lead to perceiving fires solely through the prism of the climate crisis, as if there is a political demand for it.

Undoubtedly, a dry summer contributes to the spread of fire, but when someone helps it ignite, and then sensationalizes fires as evidence of the urgent need for action in the face of an alleged climate crisis, an alert should go off in the head of every thinking person. We should ask ourselves - are we being manipulated? And the fact that this is possible after the era of Covid should be evident to every individual who gathers knowledge about the world not just from the television.